Mortgage payment collectors at companies are agreeing to ease the terms of borrowers’ underwater mortgages, but they are increasingly demanding that homeowners promise not to insult them publicly. In many cases, they are demanding that homeowners’ lawyers agree to the same terms. Sometimes, they even require borrowers to agree not to sue them again.

During the past few years, loan servicers have been renegotiating mortgage terms with borrowers who have fallen behind on their payments. Since the housing crash, there have been about 1.3 million loan modifications done under the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program, according to the U.S. Department of Treasury. Servicers have done an additional 5.6 million modifications in-house.

The 2012 National Mortgage settlement, which covered Ally Financial Group, Bank of America, Citigroup Inc, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Wells Fargo & Co prohibited the use of waivers during the course of offering normal loan modifications—though it did allow for waivers in the event of litigation. Waivers were also forbidden under HAMP modifications.

That still leaves plenty of room for servicers to try to block borrowers from suing, or to use gag clauses. The gag orders often pop up after borrowers think deal negotiations have been completed.

These clauses can hurt borrowers who later have problems with their mortgage collector (Servicer) by preventing them from complaining publicly about their difficulties or suing. If a collector, known as a Servicer, makes an error, getting everything fixed can be a nightmare without litigation or public outcry.

It was only a matter of time before it became common knowledge. Tens of thousands of homeowners have successfully litigated their foreclosure cases only to come to a fork in the road where they must make a decision: (1) finish the case at trial or (2) accept an incredibly “generous” offer from the pretender lender. My choice is option #1. But Homeowners understandably most often choose option #2.

By way of example, and not to disclose any of the details in the hundreds of cases I know have been settled to the satisfaction of the homeowner, pick a number. Let’s say you have a mortgage and note that you are successfully litigating — i.e., showing that the origination was false, that the payee and mortgagee were falsified, and that the assignment was fabricated based upon a fictitious sale of the loan because no money ever exchanged hands.

Let’s say the original note and mortgage was for $500,000 and the property was only worth $300,000 and now the property is worth $250,000. The foreclosing pretender lender sat on the case and now is claiming that the total owed, with accrued interest, fees, costs etc. is now $700,000. Assume you know you have them right where you want them.

Suddenly the attorney for the bank or someone from the back of the courtroom whom you didn’t realize was there, proposes that the case be settled. The settlement terms are that the balance due will be $100,000, the interest rate 2% fixed, and the term is 40 years. So your choice is getting rid of that last $100,000 or accepting a mortgage and note of dubious legality for $100,000 and taking the risk of title problems later when you try to sell or refinance.

Most people, faced with the possibility of losing even when they are confident of success, take the deal. And the fact that it comes with all kinds of confidentiality and gag clauses doesn’t stop them. But lawyers and homeowners take note: if you are well informed and litigate aggressively, these results are frequently and most likely in reach.

The reason why you don’t hear about success in defeating the banks is because people are under gag orders not to talk about it.

Gag orders and bans on suing are appearing when borrowers use litigation to settle foreclosure and loan modification cases. But they are also popping up when the Servicer modify loan terms outside of the courts, known as “ordinary loan modifications.

So what options does the struggling Homeowner have in order to protect his/her rights and the equity in their homes?

The Answer is;

“Pro Se” Litigation (Self Representation – Do it Yourself) for Mortgage Fraud using foreclosure defense package found at http://www.fightforeclosure.net homeowners preserved their equity, saves Attorneys fees by doing it “Pro Se” and pursuing a litigation for mortgage fraud amongst other causes of action. This option allow the homeowner to stay in their home for 3-5 years for FREE without making a red cent in mortgage payment, until the “Pretender Lender” loses a fortune in litigation costs to high priced Attorneys which will force the “Pretender Lender” to early settlement in order to modify the loan; reducing principal and interest in order to arrive at a decent figure of the monthly amount the struggling homeowner could afford to pay.

If you find yourself in an unfortunate situation of losing or about to lose your home to wrongful fraudulent foreclosure, and need a complete package that will show you step-by-step litigation solutions helping you challenge these fraudsters and ultimately saving your home from foreclosure either through loan modification or “Pro Se” litigation visit: http://www.fightforeclosure.net

Advertisements